<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PC vs. Mac for Digital Photography Tasks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manalang.com/archives/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manalang.com/archives/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/</link>
	<description>enhancing your experience since 2003.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham McIntire</title>
		<link>http://manalang.com/archives/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/#comment-17942</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham McIntire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manalang.wordpress.com/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/#comment-17942</guid>
		<description>I'd tend to disagree with that article.  It really depends on what you're doing, and for the most part you're comparing apples to oranges.  I have an Athlon XP at home that runs at 2.1GHz that will stomp out p4 2.5GHz+, so don't let the speed rating alone get to you.

I bought a brand new g4 iBook last fall when they came out, and I haven't even looked back since then.  I work as a PC repair tech during the school, and greatly look forward to when I can go home at night to my mac.  It may be a measly 800MHz, but unless I try to run games on it, I don't really even notice.  Like said in the previous comment, it just works.  I use it for my digital photography, email, web development, and about anything else besides gaming.

I would also agree that its about usability and not speed alone.  I can get the same work done in a fraction of the time when I'm using my mac simply because it works and I don't have to fight with it while I'm working.  iPhoto has worked beyond my expectations with 3 different cameras so far.

I actually enjoy using it so much, I just bought a used beige g3 for my fiance to use, mainly with iPhoto and her camera (so she doesn't have to borrow my iBook every time she takes pictures.)  Its a psaltry 300mhz computer so its no ferarri of macs, but I guarantee it will hold its own against pc's running much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d tend to disagree with that article.  It really depends on what you&#8217;re doing, and for the most part you&#8217;re comparing apples to oranges.  I have an Athlon XP at home that runs at 2.1GHz that will stomp out p4 2.5GHz+, so don&#8217;t let the speed rating alone get to you.</p>
<p>I bought a brand new g4 iBook last fall when they came out, and I haven&#8217;t even looked back since then.  I work as a PC repair tech during the school, and greatly look forward to when I can go home at night to my mac.  It may be a measly 800MHz, but unless I try to run games on it, I don&#8217;t really even notice.  Like said in the previous comment, it just works.  I use it for my digital photography, email, web development, and about anything else besides gaming.</p>
<p>I would also agree that its about usability and not speed alone.  I can get the same work done in a fraction of the time when I&#8217;m using my mac simply because it works and I don&#8217;t have to fight with it while I&#8217;m working.  iPhoto has worked beyond my expectations with 3 different cameras so far.</p>
<p>I actually enjoy using it so much, I just bought a used beige g3 for my fiance to use, mainly with iPhoto and her camera (so she doesn&#8217;t have to borrow my iBook every time she takes pictures.)  Its a psaltry 300mhz computer so its no ferarri of macs, but I guarantee it will hold its own against pc&#8217;s running much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gorsuch</title>
		<link>http://manalang.com/archives/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/#comment-17941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gorsuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manalang.wordpress.com/2004/01/06/pc_vs_mac_for_digital_photography_tasks/#comment-17941</guid>
		<description>It depends what you're going for -  speed of functionality.  I'm a network engineer who deals largely with Windows boxen during the day, and my Mac at night.

Believe me - the current G4 may not stack against the Intel boxes in speed, but it's way more useable - something I decided was more important a year ago when I switched.

I use my Mac everyday for everything from email to music production to film editing.  It just works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends what you&#8217;re going for -  speed of functionality.  I&#8217;m a network engineer who deals largely with Windows boxen during the day, and my Mac at night.</p>
<p>Believe me - the current G4 may not stack against the Intel boxes in speed, but it&#8217;s way more useable - something I decided was more important a year ago when I switched.</p>
<p>I use my Mac everyday for everything from email to music production to film editing.  It just works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
